tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5136459329395919462023-11-16T03:55:55.718-08:00Tyranny SentinelGeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.comBlogger449125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-88664615922855336692016-03-11T22:41:00.002-08:002016-03-11T22:41:43.070-08:00White Rabbit and the Mad Hater<br />
<br />
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-12-2016 The White Rabbit and the
Mad Hater</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Marco Rubio had a chance to bow out
gracefully and retain some sort of political future for himself,
possibly in a Ted Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
administration. He seems to have blown that chance. Knowing that he
had no chance at all to win in Ohio, Marco made the “magnanimous”
gesture of telling his (few) Ohio supporters to cast a vote for
Kasich instead.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Then
Marco Rubio agents joined Ted Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
rallies and passed out pamphlets announcing a deal between the
candidates where Rubio would have Florida, Kasich would have Ohio and
Ted Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
would focus on the other states. Erick Erickson, a long-time Rubio
supporter before conceding reality and backing Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
was alerted to this “deal” and reported it online.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">There
was no deal. It was nothing but a dirty trick from the desperate
Rubio campaign which look like it cannot win the Senators own state.
As a matter of fact, a few days at a rally in Hialeah, Florida only a
very few people showed up. They held it at a football field and
barely needed the red </span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">one.
It was probably more of a family reunion than a rally.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Make
no mistake, Hialeah is squarely in the midst of Marco Rubio's
strongest territory and very close to his hometown of Miami. The fact
that hardly anyone there showed up tells us that “Marcomentum” is
dead and buried. Instead of accepting this reality (he has no chance
to win in Florida), his campaign announces this bogus deal.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Not
only did the Kasich campaign refute any deal, they said they did not
need Rubio's help to win Ohio and Rubio did not need their help to
lose Florida. Does he have any credibility left after this stunt</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">?</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Donald
Trump has long encouraged his supporters to “rough up” protesters
at his rallies. It has become a common thing for “disruptors” to
be escorted out of Trump events. All too often the only disruption
was from Trump supporters singling out people who didn't look right
or wore the wrong t-shirt. Heaven help the curious Republican who
might have leaned toward another candidate coming to give Trump a
chance. They are seen as “traitors” by the mob.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Trump
denies that he supports these violent acts committed by his
followers, but that comes with a wink and a nod. He has been recorded
more than a few times encouraging such violence, even recently in
Missouri where at least one ambulance was called he exclaimed “There
used to be consequences for protesting!”</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Missouri,
I can’t believe this. </span><em><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">There
used to be consequences to protesting. There are none anymore</span></em><strong><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">.</span></strong><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
These people are so bad for our country, you have no idea folks.” -
Donald Trump</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Whether
he was thinking of the Tienanmen Square massacre by the Chinese,
after which Trump praised the Chinese governments “strength” and
resolve he said the US was lacking, or the peaceful Civil Rights
marchers who were beaten with clubs, attacked by dogs and high
pressure hoses is the question.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Trump
has called for more controls on the media, the internet, government
back-door access to all cellphones while commonly saying those who
oppose him were “going to have problems.” This is not a man who
believes in freedom of speech, to say the least.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Did
anyone really think this would create more “unity” in this
country?</span></div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-27838075656479777282016-03-11T06:02:00.002-08:002016-03-11T06:02:27.898-08:00Failure of the crowdfunded candidate
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }A:link { }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-11-2016 FAILURE OF THE
CROWDFUNDED CANDIDATE</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The Donald Trump pre-release beta
received wide praise and caused excitement at the press conference
where it was pitched to the potential customers. Since then the
product has not exactly come along as it was originally promised. It
had a catchy title and a slogan, re-purposed from the days of Ronald
Reagan, but nothing much else.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
It was promises and the dreams of what
it might become that caused people to buy in and invest their heart
and desires into Donald Trump. The new and improved Donald Trump
would be “anti-establishment” and “conservative” and he would
“Make America Great Again”. What could be better than that<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">?</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Sure
there was Ted Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">,
who was all of these things, and had an actual record to prove it,
but he was not as flashy and promoted as the Donald Trump pre-release
beta. </span>Since then there has been no real improvement in the
Donald Trump beta, except it has gone from Trump 0.0.1 to 0.0.4.
Meanwhile the Ted Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
product has shown to be very polished and has been operating
smoothly.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Last
night Donald Trump version 0.0.5 was showed off at another televised
debate. Even a niche product like Kasich ran rings around this flawed
version. Trump version 0.0.5 is even more buggier than the first
pre-release version. Violence breaking out at Trump rallies, which
the candidate thinks is no big deal and even offered to pay for the
defense of his violence-prone minions.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">One
of the biggest flaws in the whole Trump program is the lack of specs
and a help file. In the past we have had sketchy candidates that went
this way and that because they had “too many chefs in the kitchen”
but with Trump the hemming and hawing probably comes from having no
chefs in the kitchen.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">The
product is flashy and showy, but it is not as advertised. The product
is not anti-establishment and has assailed Ted Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z
for having no friends in the Senate (not my job or purpose to make
friends in the Senate, Ted Cruz responds.), he has attacked the
Senator for not making deals and compromising his principles to “get
things done” (you cannot get more establishment than that). The
product is also not conservative, see the candidates adamant defense
of Planned Parenthood, which the campaign now reluctantly admits
(although they will no doubt switch back to their old ways).</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Donald
Trump version 0.0.5 has more bugs than features. In fact, all of the
features are just promises of what will come in the future. It will
be great, tremendous, it will be the best product ever imagined, you
will love it, trust me on this they keep telling us. The candidate
keep making the same promises and speeches while denying there is a
problem. How do you fix a problem if you deny there is one?</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Unfortunately,
far too many opted to invest in the product. They pin their desires
and their fervent hopes on its eventual final release version,
despite the real doubts this can ever happen. Even the bloatware that
is Senator Marco Rubio has a better product, even if they have to
spend ten times its value advertising it and getting little return.
Yet Rubio runs rings around the immobile Trump as he stands there
haughtily staring out into space.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Far
too many people refuse to believe that the promised product called
Trump doesn't exist and will never exist. They have already invested
and refuse to see the reality of the situation: Trump is not going to
happen. Trump is not going to improve. Trump is more malware than
anything else.</span></div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-19188865574486782272016-03-10T06:06:00.002-08:002016-03-10T06:06:26.251-08:00RACE TO THE BOTTOM<br />
<br />
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-10-2016 RACE TO THE BOTTOM</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
It is good to see that some former
candidates are starting to see the grim reality that is the Donald
Trump candidacy. Although it's pretty late. Rick Santorum, Lindsey
Graham and Carly Fiorina have all come out and endorsed Ted Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
for President. In the case of moderate Republican Graham, this was
very reluctant indeed.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Most
supporters of Ted Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z
like his uncompromising conservatism, but the “establishment”
Republicans really hate a man that cannot be bribed or bought. Their
instinct probably tells them to keep propping up Marco Rubio, but his
dismal primary results will make it virtually impossible to even hand
him the nomination at a brokered convention.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Donald
Trump and his supporters are always talking about polls. They are
obsessed with polls, except the ones that show Hillary squashing
Trump like a bug in November. 64% of Americans have a negative view
of Trump, according to polls. Democrat cross-overs playing “operation
chaos” are the only reason he has won in most of the states he won.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Many
Republicans will make a protest vote against Trump in November. There
is nothing about Donald Trump that is Republican, much less
conservative. A lot of conservatives just won't be able to bring
themselves to vote for a man who shares none of their values or core
beliefs.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">A
new NBC-Wall Street Journal shows Hillary Clinton would beat Donald
Trump 51% to 38%, and this is before the media really start going
after Donald Trump. If he wins the nomination, I think the media will
savage him with stories that show his corruption and delusions as
clear as day. I also think that Trump would drop out and blame the
media for it.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">There
is no way this narcissist, who says he has never made a mistake,
would sit there while his corrupt past is dragged through the mud.
His liberal history is shown to the voters. While the children of
mobsters go on TV to talk about having birthday parties on Donald's
yacht. While retired politicians and others discuss the back-room
deals they made with Trump. While his past business failures are
highlighted day in and day out.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Trump
cannot handle even the slightest criticism. He will produce bogus
evidence, like the BBB fax, or the table full of fake Trump steaks,
to back up his lies. The media laughs this off right now, but they
will call him on it in the general election. He will double and
triple-down on mistakes instead of moving on. He will continue to say
stupid things about his hands and nether regions on national
television.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">I
think, if he doesn't drop out in the middle of the campaign, he will
be lucky to get that 38% that he polls right now against Hillary
Clinton. Not only will that mean a dramatic loss for the Republican
Party, in a race they should have easily won, they will face major
losses in the House and Senate and state legislatures.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Not
only would it be a banner year for the Democrats but for the
Libertarian and Constitution Parties as conservatives and
liberty-minded libertarians abandon the GOP. All of this because the
Republican Party was stupid enough to allow open primaries. It was
bad enough to let the liberal media influence the nomination, now we
have millions of Democrats coming over to nominate the biggest loser.</span></div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-45453094518980779732016-03-08T22:40:00.001-08:002016-03-08T22:40:35.507-08:00CHASING THE SCAMMER<br />
3-9-2016 CHASING THE SCAMMER<br /><br />Marco Rubio needs to drop out of the primary if his goal is to stop Donald Trump, and preserve any hope for a future elective office. Kasich is simply a regional candidate out of Ohio who has no hope to get the nomination but dreams that a brokered convention can be his coronation. That is ridiculous, Kasich and Rubio need to bow out gracefully before this whole thing gets really bad.<br /><br />Marco Rubio spent more than a million dollars advertising in Michigan and had nothing to show for it. Kasich needed to come in second to be able to keep up the pretense of being a contender for the nomination. These big spenders lost out to Trump (open primary) and to Ted Cruz who spent nothing in the state. <br /><br />Marco Rubio couldn't buy a state if he were as wealthy as Donald Trump. He didn't even reach 5% in Mississippi. Rubio and Kasich are nothing but spoilers in this primary election. They represent the malleable go-along, get-along country club Republicans who dislike conservatives a lot more than they dislike the left.<br /><br />It should be obvious to anyone that this is now a two-man race. The Democrat Trump and a true conservative are the choices and the country clubbers need to make their choice, now. As much a they would like to take this to convention, it's a bad bad idea. They are already trying to change the convention rules to benefit candidates that won almost no delegates.<br /><br />Donald Trump must be stopped. His whole goal is the destruction of the Republican Party, he hasn't kept that a secret. The man has so many skeletons in his closet and on his mantle and framed on his wall, he's proud of his flaws, he has no real hope of winning the general election. Not that I think he ever really intended to.<br /><br />I said that Trump is like the love child of Lex Luthor and Gordon Geko with his philosophy of greed and destruction. At the moment, though, he reminds me of the possessed doll Chucky who wants to destroy and wreak havoc.<br /><br />The way he throws around insults and lies about everything, it sometimes seems he is trying to lose and can't shake off the sycophantic supporters. When the Republican “leader” is dissing Nancy Reagan's looks and generally acting like that mouthy kid you hated back in school. <br /><br />Trump also released a video of himself verbally attacking some of the former Trump U students that have filed suit. A stupid move, but Trump can't admit when he is wrong. He is a narcissist and it against his nature, instead he doubles and triples down. Imagine making a wrong turn an deciding that you should just keep driving forward defiantly. That is Trump.<br /><br />A note: Six years ago Trump University was denied the ability to practice in the state of Texas due to “deceptive trade practices” by state Attorney General Greg Abbott who is now the Governor. Even in 2010, with a D from the BBB, it was already established that the thing wasn't above-board.<br /><br />With a primary looming in Hawaii, Donald Trump -true to form- tweeted “I employ many people in Hawaii at my great hotel in Honolulu. I’ll be there very soon. Vote for me, Hawaii!”.<br /><br />It's not his hotel. He didn't develop it, run it or own it. All he did was license the hotel to use his famous name. (and no, not Drumpf) This is something Trump does a lot, and many of the outfits using his name have been little more than scams.<br /><br />It is harder and harder to imagine this buffoon as President. Then again, as Ted Cruz said, Trump might be the only person on Earth who couldn't beat Hillary in November.GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-30036108610564741362016-03-07T22:00:00.001-08:002016-03-07T22:00:14.596-08:00Frauds love their fraudster-in-chief<br />
<br />
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }A:link { }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-8-2016 FRAUDS LOVING FRAUDS</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald Trump is a rude and arrogant
narcissistic con-man. Donald Trump is many bad things, he is the
embodiment of every stereotype of a Hollywood bad guy, villain and
heel. Yet, as bad as he is Trump is not the biggest problem this
country has.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
It is the dumb and ignorant people who
support him that are the bigger problem. You see, when Trumpismo
finally crashes and burns to cinders, the slavishly loyal sycophants
will still be around. They won't suddenly get a clue and become
normal again. No, once riled up the masses of stupid people will stay
riled up. Blame inertia.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald Trump lies and casts false
aspersions like he breathes. So do his worst followers who think
nothing of making up and happily spreading the most base of lies
about anyone who dares raise a concern about their new lord and
master. Truth, facts, history, logic, common sense... none of these
things are very important in their battle against reality.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Once upon a time they pretended they
liked Ted Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">,
he was swell guy. Often they pretended they could support either for
President. Knowing their guy had no legitimacy in conservative
politics (for good reason) they commonly used them together “Go
Trump! Go Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">!”.
They did not mean it, of course, it was just politically expedient.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Of
course when anyone else threatened to get good poll ratings the
knives came out. Carly Fiorina was called “ugly” (she is a cancer
survivor and she is proud of her scars), then Ben Carson became
“psycho like a child molester) when he pulled up to Trump in polls.
You might remember the 9-minute ranting of the madman Trump as he
drove the stake into the Carson campaign. Ben Carson would never
recover.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Jeb
was always a useful punching bag.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Now
finally we have Ted Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z coming
into the cross-hairs of Trump. The same Trump that declared Ted
eligible to run for President during a nationally televised debate,
saying that he had his lawyers vet the Senator and all was good.
Suddenly, Ted Cruz is not eligible, he barely walked over the border
from Canada from the slanders thrown at him. These eligibility suits
are being thrown out now.</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">His
sycophantic followers picked up his torch. They basically accused
Cruz of being a supporter of the New World Order. Actually, Ted Cruz
had fought against the world court and for US sovereignty and won at
the Supreme Court. </span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><i>Medellin
v Texas</i></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"> is the reason
that the Hague is not extraditing Americans.</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Then
they attacked Heidi Cruz for being a member of the Council on Foreign
Relations and that she supported a North American Union. Actually she
wrote the dissenting opinion, opposing the North American Union.
Meanwhile their guy has tapped the head of the CFR as his foreign
policy guy, and not a peep from the Trumpistas.</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">They
took a loan from Goldman Sachs, secured with their own money, to
partially finance Ted's original run for Senate. Which was promptly
repaid. Their guy owes billions to banks and even owes tens of
millions to business partner George Soros. The truth does not matter
to these people, not one bit.</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Then
they try to accuse Ted Cruz of wanting federal regulation of home
schools. They know this is a lie from the start. They just do not
care. Telling lies is all they have. They know Senator Cruz wants no
federal involvement in education, not even in government schools.
Senator Cruz has been endorsed by many home school groups because
they know he is one of their biggest supporters and defenders.</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Lately
they try to claim that the Senator tried to block aid to Flint,
Michigan. Whether or not this is a matter for the federal government,
this accusation is just as untrue as all the rest. A slight delay in
order to read the bill is not an attempt to block it. </span></span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">It
should bother them, well or at least sane people, that bills are
passing unread!</span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Of
course to sane people, not the Trump tribes,
truth-facts-honor-decency and other good things still matter! Just
because they are supporting a sleazy con artist who waves around fake
faxes from the BBB to pretend his lie is fact, doesn't mean it's
fact.</span></span></div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-42033663592979133212016-03-06T14:36:00.005-08:002016-03-06T14:36:55.816-08:00PRIMARIANS (No Trump Junk Edition)
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }A:link { }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-7-2016 PRIMARIANS (NO TRUMP JUNK
EDITION)</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I found it funny. With all of the
parallels to Hitler the last thing the Trump campaign needed was a
very photographic moment of exhorting the crowd to pledge their
loyalty to him with their right hands in the air. Almost nobody had
their right hand straight up, if you know where I'm going. They all
mimicked the 70-year old Trump who probably couldn't hold his hand up
straight, he was probably very tired by then.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The imagery though. Wow.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpK45TJ422Qy91dtHAM2Jp55x1XDDkVoKWvvwA7VY9TQlAcrFzGX6fEY7mJKB_8LCyY8HNSxZxKnsFXC1LFL8BCZwHF88thPrRw3qR8FAOpIbt9fsKsrSok7usQx_H1AScWvOfEVqazoA/s1600/heiltr.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpK45TJ422Qy91dtHAM2Jp55x1XDDkVoKWvvwA7VY9TQlAcrFzGX6fEY7mJKB_8LCyY8HNSxZxKnsFXC1LFL8BCZwHF88thPrRw3qR8FAOpIbt9fsKsrSok7usQx_H1AScWvOfEVqazoA/s320/heiltr.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald Trump got his rear handed to him
at CPAC and in the vote in Maine and Kansas. In Kansas he lost to Ted
Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
so bad, that he had half the vote or less of his opponent. Donald
Trump barely eked out wins in Louisiana and Kentucky. It is very
clear he would not be winning primaries like these with candidates
like Marco Rubio and liberal Kasich splitting up the vote.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">This
did not stop Trump from demanding they drop out and allow him to face
Ted Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z one on one,
something he had declined not too long ago. Maybe he was drunk. Trump
might have the upper-hand in the March 15 states, with or without the
additional candidates. Polls have showed Senator Marco Rubio second
in his home state of Florida and polls show that Governor Kasich does
well in his home state of Ohio (and Michigan)</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Even
if Trump wins these states and 165 additional delegates, he will be
far from having the nomination in the bag. In fact the establishment
which doesn't like Trump or Cruz seems to want a brokered convention
more than anything. Possibly the establishment promised Rubio-Kasich
spots on the ticket to stay in the race?</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">I
suppose we will now find out whether Rubio is really more anti-Trump
or establishment. If his main goal is to stop Donald Trump, he should
drop out now. Without making any deal with the Cruz campaign.
Personally, I don't think he would make a good Vice President choice
for Ted Cruz with his support for amnesty and sugar subsidies and his
general squishiness. He doesn't appear very popular in Florida, so he
would add nothing and might even hurt Cruz as VP.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Meanwhile
we learn that Trump was waving around a fake fax to support his lie
that the BBB gave Trump University an 'A' rating. The BBB doesn't
have current rating for defunct enterprises, did not send the fax and
the last known rating for Trump U was a 'D'. In other words Donald
Trump was parading a fraud as if it were the most natural thing in
the world to him.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">I
think that says a lot about Trump. Even when he wrong he will
double-down, triple-down and produce fraudulent evidence of his lie
being true. No wonder he doesn't think he has ever done anything
wrong in his life. He has no concept of being wrong, as if it is not
possible for him to do wrong. He is too God-like to be wrong, in his
own mind.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Trump,
a lifelong self-promoting funder of liberal causes, continues a
campaign without substance, without ideology and without any
principles. The only campaign theme that has surfaced is Trump's call
for America to become more greedy. “Take, take, take and grab,
grab, grab.” This is the Trump manifesto if there is one.</span></div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-58991160425890610622016-03-05T00:31:00.003-08:002016-03-05T00:31:53.438-08:00Trump, the National Vulgarian<br />
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-5-2016</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
So, Donald Trump doesn't want to keep
associating with those horrible, pesky, icky conservatives at the
CPAC convention. I am sure there will be some lame excuse. Some kind
of conspiracy theory no doubt to explain that shadowy forces are at
work for nefarious purposes. Balderdash!</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
At the last debate Donald Trump
expressed a softer line on immigration, only to retract it the next
day.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
At the last debate Donald Trump
stridently and unapologetically supported torture of our enemies and
of slaughtering the innocent wives and children of terrorists. This
is not just plain evil, it is in violation of the Geneva Convention,
an actual war crime. When told that some soldiers might refuse such
unlawful and horrifyingly evil orders he responded with a veiled
threat saying they will definitely obey him.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
So Donald Trump left us reeling and
wondering if our soldiers were going to commit atrocities for the
greater glory of Trumpland for the new emperor. Would we someday have
to watch New Nuremberg trials<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">?</span>
Okay many of us were also having nightmare of him expressing
confidence in the size of his hands and private parts. Hardly
something any serious candidate for President would say, but totally
in character for third world dictators.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Invading foreign countries for the sole
purpose of taking their oil (and other resources) is also a part of
Trump's nationalistic rhetoric. His governing philosophy that the
government must be greedy, that it must take, take, take, grab, grab,
grab comes clearly into play. Insanely and shockingly this all starts
to sound like an actual cohesive world view, with parts that fit
together. Not that it is something we would want to hear from one of
the leading Presidential candidates.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald J Trump, most assuredly not a
conservative and most obviously not an outsider, probably has good
reason for not wanting to explain his whole political philosophy in
one sitting. I am starting to think it would be one of the more
repulsive manifesto's ever put into one place.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
At the last debate Trump also explained
that he'd likely get his foreign policy chops from the Council n
Foreign Relations. Which is kind of funny. Many of his supporters
have weaved fabulous conspiracy theories involving a CFR that wants
to dominate the world and that Ted Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
is one of their puppets. The same Ted Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
that helped argue the case of </span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><i>Medellin
v Texas</i></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"> which stopped
any jurisdiction the World Court would have in the US without our
government saying so.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">So,
the Trumpnauts have decided that the only candidate in the race that
has defeated the New World Order is somehow part of the New World
Order conspiracy through the CFR. Meanwhile their candidate, Lord
Trump, is praising the CFR and talking about making it part of his
team. This, of course, does not phase his insane supporters one bit.
It doesn't bother them. Lord Trump is strong and he can associate
with the CFR without the stench clinging to his ties! </span>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Just
like the many lies he tells doesn't bother them. Lord Trump is not
only above decency and ethics, but he is also above truth. If Lord
Trump tells a lie, it becomes truth! This is how strong Lord Trump
is.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Meanwhile
the Trump that claims not to know who David Duke is, has apparently
given media credentials to a white supremacist radio program and
Trump Jr gave them a 20-minute interview, airing sometime Saturday. I
would love to see a transcript of that.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">The
Short-Fingered Vulgarian Nationalist ditches CPAC and moves onward,
ever onward, in his campaign to destroy the Republican Party. </span>
</div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-13035287926418683772016-03-03T18:36:00.001-08:002016-03-03T18:36:25.889-08:00THE RISE OF TRUMAPLISM
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-4-2016</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald Trump cannot tell you what a
conservative is. Trump cannot properly define conservatism in a
political context. He cannot explain the philosophical underpinnings
of conservatism, the <i>why </i>conservatives believe what they do.
This is because, Donald Trump is not, by any measure, a conservative.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
He now pretends that he opposed the
invasion of Iraq, but the facts and tapes prove otherwise. That is
not the point of this article though.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
When asked to define conservatism,
Trump had this to say:</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook L, serif;"><i>TRUMP:
“Well, I think it’s a person that doesn’t want to take risks. I
think that’s a good thing. A person that wants to in terms of
government I’m talking about. Person that wants to conserve, a
person that wants to in financial sense balance budgets. A person
that feels strongly about the military and I feel very strong low
about the military. And you have some of these Amy they don’t even
want to focus on the military. Our military is falling apart I feel
very — I have always felt very strongly about the military. By the
way, if you look at vision, the word vision, I was the one that said,
take the oil, I’ve been saying that for years, take the oil, let’s
take the oil.</i></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
There is nothing conservative about
invading other countries and looting their oil. This is something
that evil regimes do. The philosophy of Trump is one that praises
“strong” tyrants like Putin and red China's massacre at Tienanmen
Square. The man who has glowing words for Qaddafi and Saddam Hussein.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
In short, he believes might makes
right. His philosophy of greedy government (not conservative) take,
take, take, grab, grab, grab, comes into play again. Donald Trump is
not interested in individual rights, those are not as important to
him as a large glorious imperial America.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
An America where electronics companies
are forced to give government a back-door to software to spy on the
American people. An America where you had better get off of federal
land, contract or no contract, lease or no lease because, by Gawd,
Great Big Government said so.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
An America where dissent is punished.
Again, this is not conservative in the least. The freedom of the
press, the freedom of online speech <i>et al</i>, must be surrendered
for the greater glory of government. Dissidents and protesters might
be threatened with being roughed up and thrown into snow without
their coats, before he is in power, but afterwards it will be met
with worse punishment.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald J Trump in no way espouses
conservatism. At best he is a big government Nationalist who is
hiding his socialist core tendencies. If this man somehow becomes
President, not at all a likely thing, there will be nothing holding
back those tendencies. National socialism, although not the kind
Hitler pursued as dictator, is exactly the philosophy of Trump.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Nothing good can come of it.</div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-65140025719454532672016-03-02T07:48:00.001-08:002016-03-02T07:48:16.123-08:00Trump's Schizoid Campaign<br />
<br />
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }A:link { }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-3-2016 Trump's Schizoid<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
Campaign</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“This why we lose. You want a pure
candidate who cannot win.”</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
This is the consensus opinion from
Trump supporters. The image that Trump supporters want to convey is
one of a strong dedicated leader who will beat back the RINO hordes.
The truth, in fact, is quite the opposite. The supporters of Donald
Trump have concluded that Romney, McCain and Dole lost because they
were too conservative.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald Trump even blamed the 2012
Republican loss on the right-wing “too conservative” views of the
Vice Presidential candidate of Paul Ryan. Yes, that Paul Ryan. The
establishment choice for Speaker of the House who immediately pushed
through funding for Obamacare.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Their strategy is to back the liberal
Democrat in the Republican primary who won't express any solid
opinions, in fact they are all over the map, while blaming radical
conservatives like Paul Ryan, McCain and Bob Dole for past losses.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The reason they hate Ted Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
is the same reason that the establishment hates him, he is too
conservative and he cannot be bought. He refuses to make deals with
the Democrats. While promoting rhetoric as a backlash against the
establishment liberal deal-makers, they promote their liberal
deal-maker candidate. Remember “everything is negotiable”.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">They
claim to oppose corrupt deals in government while promoting someone
who boasts about the politicians he has bought. A guy who gave
socialist Rahm Emmanuel $50,000 while he ran for mayor of Chicago,
and in return his company received millions in tax breaks, which
ordinary taxpayers will have to cover.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">It
is as if their whole 'movement' is some kind of social mental
disease. They pretend to oppose the very kind of politician they are
celebrating. Apparently we aren't supposed to know what kind of
person Trump really is. Our memories aren't suppose to go back more
than a few months. No wonder this guy wants to scour the internet and
sue the media, he has to hide his life story to be electable.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Trump
is a man who thinks greed is good. As if he is trying to portray a
stereotypical Hollywood villain he says this kind of stuff:</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook L, serif;"><i>You
know, I get greedy. I want money, money. Now, I’m going to — I’ll
tell you what we’re going to do, right? We get greedy, right? Now
we’re going to get greedy for the United States. We’re going to
grab and grab and grab,” Trump said.</i></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">What
kind of person wants an activist greedy government</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">?</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">
Democrat liberals.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Conservatives
do not want the government to be more greedy than it already is.
Conservatives also do not think that the job of government is to tax
the people in order to give it to major (favored) corporations. These
are not conservative values.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">There
is nothing conservative about Donald Trump and his campaign. The vast
majority of his endorsements bear this out. Does anyone really think
Chris Christie is anywhere close to conservative</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">?</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">The
conservatism of Trump is as fake as his tan.</span></div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-17541846827723933312016-03-01T15:37:00.002-08:002016-03-01T15:37:26.492-08:00Principles of Things<br />
<br />
<br />
<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
3-2-2016 Principles of Things</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The voting center was not very crowded
but I did have to wait a few minutes for a booth to open up before I
could vote. My brother-in-law's aunt is working the precinct, she
said she has been doing this for more than 5 days now. The Democrat
table was very quiet although a few came in before I left, giving the
poor volunteer something to do. There are no local or county
contested races in their party.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
I voted for Ted Cru<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">,
of course. In some of the other races my mind went blank, lol. I
guess I have been too focused on the Presidential contest. I really
doubt I'm the only one.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Cru</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">z
has been a constant and consistent conservative warrior. He does not
cave or compromise our freedom for political deal-making. The
establishment truly does not like an honest man in Congress, he often
stands alone in doing the right thing. Mike Lee was his only real
support during his 21 hour vigil against funding for Obamacare, for
example. He has principles and he does not violate them.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">On
the other hand, Donald Trump has no principles. This is a man who can
lie to your face one day and deny he said it the next, with a
straight orange face. “Everything is negotiable” with Trump, and
I do mean everything. Your Bill of Rights is not important if it gets
in the way of his making a deal. He thinks the Patriot Act doesn't go
far enough. He thinks government should have access to your
cellphones and computers at all times, without a warrant.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
“<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Those
who trade liberty for security deserve neither” is a phrase that
comes to mind.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Whether
he actually believes that or not is debatable. Whether he actually
believes any of the promises and phrases he makes on the campaign
trail is also in doubt. Even his signature theme of building a wall
and sending illegal aliens home is negotiable. He stands firm and
absolute for nothing. In 2013 he was calling for amnesty for
illegals, and even just last year did the same. Last September his
first instinct was to let in the Syrian refugees.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">How
can people vote for the ever-changing platform of quicksand? It is
all an act, an illusion, a hoax. The entire Trump campaign is nothing
more or less than trolling the Republican Party, and his only real
goal seems to be to make Hillary Clinton electable again. Trump has
been good friends with the Clintons, they golf together travel to
similar places, like Epstein's Island of orgies.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">What
are his firm convictions</span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">?
What are his principles? Besides donating money to liberal
politicians, and buying corrupt favors, he appears to have none. He
is, as Jimmy Carter and others have said, malleable. He can be shaped
and bent as the liberals need him.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">The
other day he said he is rich because he is greedy. He thinks that is
a virtue that the country as a whole needs more of. He wants America
to be greedy, he thinks the government should “grab, grab, grab”.
He wondered why Iran was buying missiles from Russia instead of from
the US, as if that was something that would be good for the economy.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;">Anger
at the liberal deal-makers and compromisers in the Republican
Congress in understandable but the idea that a liberal deal-maker is
the answer to that is insanely ridiculous.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-67104982366207075282016-02-29T13:06:00.006-08:002016-02-29T13:06:52.013-08:00Trump The Wreck<br />
<br />
3-1-2016 Trump The Wreck<br /><br />Trump says the US “looks weak” to the rest of the world, so his prescription... <br /><br /><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;"><i>"When the students poured into Tienanmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it. Then they were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak … as being spit on by the rest of the world" – Donald J. Trump</i></span><br /><br />This is coming from a man promising that Republicans who don't vote for him will face some kind of reprisals. The thin-skinned narcissist has already made it known he wants to “open up” libel laws to make it easier to sue people for saying mean things on the internet. <br /><br />This comes after he vow to shut down parts of the internet to “fight ISIS”. His comments on Apple shows he also believes the government needs to be able to spy on smart phones, all of them.<br /><br />Now he complains that Iran is buying their missiles from Russia and not from the US.<br /><br /><i><span style="font-family: Georgia,"Times New Roman",serif;">“They (Iran) just ordered missiles. I didn't know they could buy missiles with their $150 billion. They just ordered missiles from Russia, nothing from the United States...”</span></i><br />Trump has also advocated a policy on terrorism of finding the wives and children of the terrorists and killing them. This is not just evil and immoral, it is an internationally recognized war crime.<br /><br />Donald Trump is a liberal fascist dictator wanna-be.<br /><br />If Trump is nominated to lead the Republican Party, there will be irrevocable damage to the party that can never be undone. The conservatives, Christians and others have always maintained an uneasy alliance within the party. His pro-big government interventionist, pro-union, protectionist, vulgar politics will be the new face of the party.<br /><br />That will be a bridge too far to many people.<br /><br />A Trump nomination will split the Republican Party. The best scenario for the GOP is that these groups simply sit out the election and Trump loses bad. The worst case scenario is that millions of conservatives and Christians leave he party for good, joining one or more third parties or staying independent instead.<br /><br />The Constitution Party looks like it would be the best option for disaffected conservatives and Christians. Its platform is similar to the one the GOP pretends to follow. Except that the Constitution Party actually <i>means</i> it.<br /><br />Right now the Constitution Party is like a small club, controlled by a few people without much money. But the mechanics are in place for a real party to rise up should millions of people flood in. Watching or taking part in a new party rise up to replace the dying Whig Party, I mean Republican Party, would be exciting.<br /><br />Hopefully Trump is not the nominee and none of this need happen. People should consider what all of this really means when they vote.GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-27992440886827219792016-02-28T21:51:00.003-08:002016-02-28T22:52:23.515-08:00Homeless Conservatives...<style type="text/css">P { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }</style>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
2-29-2016</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
“<span style="font-family: "century schoolbook l" , serif;"><i>If we must have an
enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose,
and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party
in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.” </i></span>
<br />
<span style="font-family: "century schoolbook l" , serif;"><i>-- Alexander Hamilton</i></span><br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald J Trump represents values
directly opposite to that of conservatism and I am not along in being
one who would never vote for this man. Not only would I never vote
for this person should he be the Republican nominee, I will disavow
the party altogether. I can not, in good conscience, belong to the
same party that Trump belongs to.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The Republican Party has never been
comfortable with conservatives and Christians within its ranks, and
have always sought to sideline people like us. 2016 is shaping up to
be a watershed year, a year where little light bulbs go on inside a
lot of peoples heads. The total awareness that the Republican Party
is not the proper home of the conservative movement will hit a lot of
people.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
The conservative movement has had a lot
of pretenders asking for our support, our money and our votes. They
mouth the right words on the campaign trail and forget all about
their supposed principles once they reach the state or federal
capital. The fact that Marco Rubio seriously campaigns as a
“conservative” after trying to foist an amnesty bill on the
country is a blatant example.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
He is far from the only one. We could
count on one hand the number of tried and true conservative warriors
who fight for us in Washington. Often, though, even the good ones
succumb to the temptations of power and corruption over the
principles they started with.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
Donald Trump started on the left, and
is on the left and would “govern” on the left if he somehow
becomes President. Only those wishing to be fooled are fooled by this
charlatan. Only those blinded by their desires for him to be a
whiter, “more electable”, Ted Cru<span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;">z
can fail to see the enormous and horrible baggage the man carries
with and within him.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;">Many
of them are so, properly, fed up with Washington DC and the
Republican Party that they have put scales over their eyes. They fail
to see that a true Constitution</span>al conservative is also running. Instead they ridicule him call him a
Cuban or a Canadian an lie about his record. Such people have abandoned
any honor or principles they might have had.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "century schoolbook l" , serif;"><i>But
each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own
desire. Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin
when it is fully grown brings forth death. </i></span>
</div>
<ul>
<li><div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "century schoolbook l" , serif;"><i>James
1:14-15</i></span></div>
</li>
</ul>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;">If
Donald J Trump is chosen as the nominee of the Republican Party, I
vow here and now that he will never receive my support nor my vote. I
think I can safely assume, due to the many </span><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><b>#NeverTrump</b></span><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;">
tags being posted on Facebook and Twitter than I am far from alone in
this. The Republican Party was not a good fit in the best of times,
today it seems that the Republican is a downright hostile place for
any real conservatives. For those of us not blissfully ignorant, not
comfortably dumb and not blind to the truth, we must look for a new
political home.</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;">For
myself, I am taking a good look at the Constitution Party. So far I
like what I am seeing. </span>
</div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-68177687195478338432016-02-28T12:24:00.002-08:002016-02-28T12:24:34.603-08:00Ted Cruz vs Donald Trump (No Contest)February 28, 2016<br />
<br />
Since 2008, and even long before, the
conservative movement has been longing for another Ronald Reagan.
Someone who can represent the best elements that conservatism has, all
in one package, and can unite voters from across the right-leaning
spectrum.<br />
<br />
The conservative movement has not been very successful
in breaking through the left-wing media monopoly in this country, or its
control of much of the culture, to elect conservative politicians.
Instead the Republican Party has tended to discount conservatives and
placate them with nothing but talk through election campaigns. We have
seen this time and again.<br />
<br />
Ted Cruz is the real outsider. Even as a
Senator he was far outside the Republican leadership. He had defeated a
sitting moderate Republican Senator David Dewhurst, a friend of the
establishment.<br />
<br />
In 2012, and the election of Ted Cruz, brought a
full-spectrum conservative warrior to the United States Senate. His
battles and victories in front of the Supreme Court such as his taking a
part in the Heller case on gun rights, he helped win a case involving
the 10 Commandments (Thomas Van Orden) and also along with Texas
Attorney General Greg Abbott beat back the World Court and protected
American sovereignty while keeping heinous killers locked up in Medellin
vs Texas.<br />
<br />
This reputation got Ted Cruz past the vicious attacks
of Dewhurst and his Texas Conservatives Fund PAC. If only Dewhurst had
fought the left as hard as he battled Ted, maybe something different
would have happened.<br />
<br />
While in the Senate Ted Cruz fought against
Barack Obama, the left and even the Republican establishment. He fought
lonely battles against ObamaCare and other outrages while the rest f his
own party did nothing. Most Republican members of the US Senate do
nothing but talk about opposing the left while doing nothing of
substance.<br />
<br />
He led the charge for tough new immigration laws and
battled Marco Rubio and the Gang of 8 that tried to position itself as a
“centrist”, middle of the road alternative. Although only a few
conservative Senators exist they managed to fight long enough for the
American people to see and hear what the Gang of 8 was peddling,
otherwise it would have passed before we knew what was really in it.<br />
<br />
In fact, the Republican establishment truly hates Ted Cruz more than
they hate Barack Obama. The GOP establishment wants to get along with
the left, making DC into one big club. It is those few pesky
conservatives that keep getting in the way. It is no surprise that
establishment Republicans would flock to candidates like Jeb Bush and
Marco Rubio, who get along with Democrats.<br />
<br />
Enter Donald J Trump.
The billionaire has been a longtime supporter of the left. In fact he
has donated to many of the most liberal Democrats. He claims to donate
to “both sides” but the facts show he has only donated to liberal
Republicans, some of whom have since become Democrats like Charlie Crist
in Florida. In fact he only seems to donate to people like McConnell
and Boehner when they are challenged from the right in primaries. He is
no outsider.<br />
<br />
Donald Trump has boasted about buying political
favors from politicians. In 2014 he donated to Rahm Emmanuel's mayoral
bid who had served as Barack Obama's Chief of Staff, and later received
millions in tax breaks from the city.<br />
<br />
Donald Trump has boasted
about his numerous affairs. After her death he claimed he could have
“banged” Princess Diana. In truth, she had found his advances to be
quite disturbing. He also once told a journalist he could take his wife
away. His present and fourth wife is a former porn model.<br />
<br />
On
political issues Donald Trump has been all over the map, often changing
positions completely in a single day. Even his signature, ever-morphing,
proposal to expel illegal immigrants and build a wall along the
southern border rings hollow when one reads the fine print where he
promises to let the “good ones” back in. his first position on Syrian
refugees was to let them come to America but within a short time this
had changed to being a very anti-refugee position.<br />
<br />
Donald Trump
is clearly still a liberal. His first instinct on every issue has been
liberal. What comes afterward is all political expediency. Even his
rallying cry of being an outsider has morphed to being a deal-maker who
can negotiate with the Democrats and “get things done”.<br />
<br />
This is exactly the attitude of the establishment.GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-48230803813288692852012-11-06T23:03:00.001-08:002012-11-06T23:03:06.871-08:00Freedom Dies<b>11-06-2012</b>
<P>
The US is no longer a free countryGeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-19499129676129188882012-11-06T08:11:00.003-08:002012-11-06T08:12:19.666-08:00PredictionPrediction:
<P>
Romney gets 296 Electoral Votes
<P>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m13/geronl/Screenshotfrom2012-11-04020737.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left:1em; margin-right:1em"><img border="0" width="450" src="http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m13/geronl/Screenshotfrom2012-11-04020737.png" /></a></div>
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-53540616044137191572012-11-01T19:22:00.000-07:002012-11-01T19:22:39.093-07:00Headlines from NY-NJ<b>Celebrities Party in New York City</b>
<P>
<a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2012/11/01/Obama-Celebs-Party-in-Manhattan">http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2012/11/01/Obama-Celebs-Party-in-Manhattan
</a><P>
<b>
Power outages could last 10 days</b><P>
<a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/01/14854036-sandy-power-outages-could-last-another-10-days-new-winter-storm-builds?lite">http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/01/14854036-sandy-power-outages-could-last-another-10-days-new-winter-storm-builds?lite</a>
<b>
<P>
Exasperation builds on day 3</b><P>
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/exasperation-builds-day-3-storm-stricken-nyc-202314418.html">http://news.yahoo.com/exasperation-builds-day-3-storm-stricken-nyc-202314418.html
</a><P>
<b>
Looters Target Coney Island</b><P>
<a href=" http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/looters-target-coney-island-sandy-article-1.1195080">
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/looters-target-coney-island-sandy-article-1.1195080</a>
<P>
<b>
"We need food, we need clothing" State Island residents plead for help 3 days after Sandy</b><P>
<a href=" http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/11/were-going-to-die-staten-island-residents-plead-for-help-3-days-after-sandy/">
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/11/were-going-to-die-staten-island-residents-plead-for-help-3-days-after-sandy/</a>GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-44200135254169916032012-10-25T11:39:00.002-07:002012-10-25T11:39:43.438-07:00Politics Caused Benghazi Tragedy and its Cover-Up<P>It was Obama himself who denied additional security to the embassy in Benghazi, Libya not Hillary Clinton as many had suspected. New emails and documents have shown that not only did the President and the administration know that this was a terrorist – while it was still happening – bit that absolutely nothing was done about it. The security was denied only because it would be admitting that the world was a more dangerous place. There was an election coming up and if they admitted this, it might hurt his re-election chances.
<P>
The State Department had even issued a traveled advisory warning people that Benghazi was dangerous with real threats of political violence and assassinations in August. Yet the White House continued to allow the Benghazi mission to be almost completely undefended. Intelligence e-mails before and after the attack have surfaced that show that the situation was well known.
<P>
When Barack Obama was informed of the violence at the Benghazi mission he went to bed. The attack lasted between 6 and 8 hours. During that time, an unarmed drone was reportedly launched, allowing real-time images and video to be seen by intelligence officials and the White House. Still, nothing was done through the assault and murder of 4 Americans including Ambassador Stevens.
<P>
The next morning challenger Mitt Romney openly wondered why the administration was silent on the attack and condemned the terrorism in Benghazi Libya and why the Cairo embassy seemed to apologize to the attackers. The White House went after Romney, saying he didn't know what he was talking about. This was the first instance where the administration seemingly denied that an attack took place.
<P>
For days the Obama administration kept the attention of a compliant press on the Romney “gaffe” as they worked on their next distraction. They could not politically allow the issue to become a foreign policy disaster.
<P>
The President then boarded Air Force One for a trip to Las Vegas for a multi-million dollar fund-raiser, giving the President hours to review the information on Benghazi. If the reports of the drone over Benghazi are true, then he likely had access to that aerial video as well.
<P>
Within days the administration would be openly castigating the Youtube video “Innocence of Muslims” and blaming it for causing a large protest that turned violent in Benghazi. We now know that there was no protest in Benghazi before the attack.
<P>
On September 16, five days later, UN Secretary Susan Rice on CBS saying …
<P>
“But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy–
<P>
BOB SCHIEFFER: Mm-Hm.
<P>SUSAN RICE: –sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that– in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent.”
<P>
Two days later Jay Carney said “MR. CARNEY: No, I’m saying that based on information that we — our initial information, and that includes all information — we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video. And that is what we know thus far based on the evidence, concrete evidence — not supposition — concrete evidence that we have thus far”
<P>
“Based on the information that we have now, it was — there was a reaction to the video — there was protests in Cairo, then followed by protests elsewhere, including Benghazi, and that that was what led to the original unrest. The other factors here — all factors — but the other factors here, including participants in the unrest, participants in the violence, are under investigation”
<P>
The President himself, in front of the United Nations, continued the theme almost two weeks after the attack. “The future does not belong to those who blaspheme the prophet of Islam” - a clear reference to the Youtube video.
<P>
So why did the administration continue to go down that road when they clearly knew it was not true? Their actions and accusations about the video likely sparked deadly riots in other countries, like Pakistan. 23 people reportedly died in Pakistan riots while a paid TV ad by Obama and Hillary Clinton apologized to them for the offensive video.
<P>
So the admin had to keep downplaying the events and the impact. The four deaths were simply “bumps in the road” or it was “not optimal”. Anything to keep from having to answer the hard questions of why it had spiraled out of control.
<P>
Was it all a cover-up of their failure to provide more security to the embassy, which might affect his chances at being re-elected?GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-39954152518423077542012-10-24T16:49:00.001-07:002012-10-24T16:51:44.961-07:00It was not optimal, it was OPTIONAL!They watched them die.
<P>
They spent months denying them additional security.
<P>
Their first reaction after they watched this unfold was to bash Romney for pointing it out first, blaming a Youtube video to prove Romney was wrong. Politics took priority. Every day for 2 weeks they doubled down on the story.
<P>
Their blaming the video likely sparked riots in Muslim countries, governments around the world and even the UN condemned free speech, even Obama at the UN condemned those who blasphemed Islam.
<P>ONLY later did they admit there was no protest over a video, only later did they admit it was a planned and coordinated terrorist attack. Then they tried to pretend none of this happened, that they NEVER blamed a video, then they accused Romney of making this a issue. Then Obama jokes on late night TV that it was "not optimal".
<P>DID I MISS ANYTHING??GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-38994512108555950442012-10-24T14:59:00.002-07:002012-10-24T14:59:13.194-07:00They watched them die<a href="http://nypost.tumblr.com/post/34098192321/new-york-post-cover-for-sunday-october-21-2012">http://nypost.tumblr.com/post/34098192321/new-york-post-cover-for-sunday-october-21-2012</a>
<P>
NY POST front page on SundayGeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-75860492598741793202012-10-24T06:25:00.001-07:002012-10-24T06:25:26.713-07:00He knewWho would have ever believed that a US President would be able to watch live drone feed of a savage terrorist attack on a US embassy where 4 Americans were brutally murdered and spend 2 weeks blaming a Youtube video and an innocent man? Possibly causing riots around the world by his actions?GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-32656089283687645492012-10-15T22:02:00.001-07:002012-10-15T22:02:23.501-07:00Stupid People: A Global Pestilence<b>Everyone has seen third world countries collapse their economies like Zimbabwe, Argentina and the way Venezuela seems to be doing. We all have seen how fiscally irresponsible Europe and the United States have become. Rushing head-long into brick walls over and over and expecting different results.</b>
<P>.<P>
France is ready to jump-start economic collapse by electing a President who immediately launched the 75% income tax. You can hear business owners and wealthy individuals scramble for the exits. The result is going to be less money moving around, less money invested, fewer jobs, less revenue and a lowering of the standard of living. It is as obvious as rain.
<P>
Then you have the European sovereign debt crisis as countries try to get a handle on the runaway spending. Or at least pretend to. They could easily become Zimbabwe writ large.
<P>
You have China, its government knows it is in trouble. With exports down due to the global economic slowdown they did the worst possible thing they could have done. They went on a "stimulus" spending spree building entire cities that lie dormant, massive public works projects. The result is that their hollow-shell economy is cracking like a Fabergé egg being stepped on by a horse.
<P>
Imagine that you live in a country under the gun of a hostile neighbour, literally miles from embedded artillery emplacements. You see the world in a death spiral due to unconstrained debt spending, especially spent on the unproductive sectors. Your hostile pal to the north is a "workers paradise" where 99% of the population live in grinding poverty without access to suitable healthcare or even food and water.
<P>
Meanwhile your nation is a top-7 economy. Your nation enjoys freedom. Your leaders are elected. Your media is free to criticize them. Your people are free to choose their own education and employment opportunities. A country where 97% graduate from high school.
<P>
But somehow, after just a few years of recession you are willing to chuck it all for the "feel-good" notion of "welfare for all". You have to understand that this is how the totalitarian state to your north came to be. You have to know that this idea is unworkable in the long-term. You have to know that this will change your nation for the worst for decades to come, at least.
<P>
This simply proves that stupid people can exist everywhere. That people exist who will toss common sense and sanity for catchy slogans and shallow, hollow ideals of "equality" or whatever.
<P>
But hardly anywhere will you see such rank stupid on display as this one:
<P>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RW837_Occupy_F_20120220013050.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left:1em; margin-right:1em"><img border="0" height="226" width="571" src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-RW837_Occupy_F_20120220013050.jpg" /></a></div>
<br><b>Tax the 1% Rich; Welfare for the 99%</b>
<P>
Does anyone really think it is possible for 99% to be on welfare? Seriously? Don't they know that people try to escape from countries that attempt these idiotic ideals?
....
GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-24183541976531496632012-10-04T00:20:00.000-07:002012-10-04T00:20:11.566-07:00Will Obama bomb Syria to change the topic?Editorial: DIVERSION: US to Launch Strikes Against Syria?
<P><b> DENVER, Colorado</b> – After a dispiriting debate performance almost universally banned by media pundits on both sides of the aisle, President Obama rushed off the stage while his opponent basked in the glow of an obvious victory with his family. The President seemed to be in a confused, disinterested mood, not looking at Mitt Romney or the camera very often.
<P>
Many of the assertions made by the President were quickly rebutted by the media, such as claims to have trimmed <a href=”http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/abc-obama-falsely-claims-he-has-plan-cut-4-trillion-deficit_653574.html”>the deficit by $4 trillion when no such planned existed</a>. Indeed in his first term the budget deficits added around $5 trillion to the national debt and interested close to a trillion. His assertion that he cut taxes on small business <a href=”http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/071312-618156-obama-peddles-phony-small-business-tax-cut-claims.htm?p=full”>18 times was also quickly debunked</a>.
<P>
Syrian dictator Bashar Al-Assad has a lot on his plate with the rebellion, terrorism run amuck and Turkey shelling and bombing Syrian position along the border, but he has to be even more worried now that President Barack Obama needs to change the subject from the campaign to something else.
<P>
Deflection, Diversion and Demagoguery has been a regular tactic for President Obama every time some failure or scandal threatened to erupt. When his administration apologized after their Cairo embassy was breached, not understanding that not far away in neighboring Libya the US Ambassador was being brutalized, assassinated and dragged through the streets the White House immediately pummeled Mitt Romney for jumping the gun. Then the administration denied there was terrorism involved for more than a week, instead blaming a Youtube video no-one had heard of before.
<P>
The debate has been panned by Democrats and opposition alike in the United States, making it the maybe the biggest embarrassment of this administration. Obviously President Obama will stay true to form and change the subject to something else. With his foreign policy in shambles maybe a bombing campaign against Syria's regime is just what his re-election campaign needs. No matter that it could easily become another Libya, Tunisia, Egypt etc where radical Islamists are coming to power. Only the short term political gains are important in this equation.
<P>
Bashar Al-Assad should probably be hiding far from Damascus in a secret bunker right about now.GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-22718399235265744342012-10-02T06:14:00.001-07:002012-10-02T06:14:39.245-07:00Lawless State?Can you imagine living in a lawless society, because that is the kind of thing we are getting from President Obama. His administration is asking federal contractors to violate the WARN Act and not send out layoff notices (before the election), promising to pay their fines for them.GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-28641855849217045832012-09-30T13:09:00.003-07:002012-09-30T13:09:54.520-07:00Obama's to lose? The MSM thinks so.The media has already put it out of Romney's grasp
<P><a href="http://asspos.blogspot.com/2012/09/debate-obamas-to-lose-is-romney-ready.html">
http://asspos.blogspot.com/2012/09/debate-obamas-to-lose-is-romney-ready.html</a>GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-513645932939591946.post-6829371964903521212012-09-27T22:19:00.000-07:002012-09-27T22:19:32.366-07:00City Votes Down Party Suite Fund<a href="http://asspos.blogspot.com/2012/09/city-votes-down-party-suite-funds.html">http://asspos.blogspot.com/2012/09/city-votes-down-party-suite-funds.html</a>
<P>Somewhere in North Texas, a few grifters are crying.
<P>The names and places have been changed to protect the grifters.GeronLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13145189615256636055noreply@blogger.com0